The Good...
Triple H and Shawn Michaels' emotionally-charged encounter that was the highlight of the show for me. It gave new intrigue to the impending Undertaker/Triple H match at Wrestlemania and gave The Game new motivation for ducking The Phenom: he doesn't want to hurt business by taking Taker out. I look forward to seeing how Undertaker responds to that statement.
The Bad...
The commentary took a step back this week. Michael Cole was back to being a cheerleader and didn't spend enough time calling matches. It didn't help the show at all. And why was Michael Cole praising Daniel Bryan so much when he was sitting at the announce table and then bashing Bryan again once the champ left? Heel announcers have done this before, but Cole was too extreme and over the top.
Tamina's win over Brie Bella helped show the daughter of Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka has in-ring skill, as she hit a pretty splash off the top rope and a teeth-rattling back body drop, but this was totally a 2-minute squash match. Brie had very little offense and not enough time was given for any sort of story to really be told in the ring. Once again I will repeat, if you want the audience to take the divas seriously as wrestlers, the WWE must give them time to show their skill and charisma in the ring.
I like that Chris Jericho beat Kofi Kingston in their match, but how did Jericho kick out of 2 Trouble-In-Paradise finishers and defeat Kingston with 1 Code Breaker? They got a few minutes to tell the story in their contest and both competitors got in some offense and some nice spots. But it just doesn't sit well with me that sometimes finishers are lights-out and sometimes don't really mean much. Did a thumb to Kingston's eye really make Jericho's finisher that much better? I think it's becoming very obvious we will see Jericho/Punk at Mania.
The Ugly...
The 6-superstar debate that started RAW was just not good. Except for R-Truth's weird story about eating spiders, there were no exceptional speeches and it didn't help anyone gain support or heat. Also, why didn't a huge brawl break out when Jericho started insulting everyone and throwing podiums around? It just lacked any umph and felt very awkward.
CM Punk and the Miz had a short match in which Punk had most of the offense. Are they trying to squash the Miz and tell the audience that there is no way he can win the Elimination Chamber match? Miz was in the main event at last year's Wrestlemania and ain't going to be anywhere near it this time around.
The Meh...
The R-Truth victory over Dolph Ziggler wasn't a great match and Truth's victory came out of nowhere, which I DON'T LIKE. Every time you see a guy gaining momentum these days, you know he will lose within a minute.
The Kane/Cena/Ryder/Eve storyline saw yet another deadly attack on Zack Ryder by Kane, but I enjoyed the plot twist. Eve kissing Cena and subsequently telling Long Island Iced Z that he is just a friend was unexpected and an interesting device to use to push Cena closer to the edge of becoming a heel. I'm just not fully sure why Eve kissed him because in previous weeks it seemed very clear she liked Ryder and was certainly not fond of Cena. Some good and some head-scratching confusion puts this one in the Meh column.
Daniel Bryan didn't need to interfere with the Randy Orton/Big Show match, as they were doing a decent job in the ring and developing a rivalry between them. Theses run-in endings are hardly ever satisfying; however, Bryan did an excellent job playing up his character and has started to generate tons of heat from the audience. Again, a mixed bag segment.
Overall: 68/70
The show advanced the Cena/Kane and HHH/Undertaker storylines, but the matches left something to be desired. The crowd was ok and the mic work was entertaining, apart from the debate segment. Finally, the show would have been just as entertaining without the announcers. They are being wasted right now.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Friday, February 10, 2012
On Full-Day Kindergarten
I just read an interesting article written by Meredith Martin, an SK-grade one teacher. She points out some interesting effects of the implementation of full-day kindergarten that the average non-kindergarten teacher wouldn't realize or think about. You can read her article below.
http://theagenda.tvo.org/blog/agenda-blogs/rollout-full-day-kindergarten
Essentially, she is not a big fan of full-day kindergarten because it hurts daycare funding, many schools don't have enough classrooms equipped with bathrooms and the like to house all the registered youngsters and the class sizes are too big for any teacher/ECE to effectively look after the emotional and educational needs of students who are under 5 years old.
This is a timely article, given that Don Drummond's report on ways to control provincial government spending in Ontario is likely to suggest that full-day kindergarten be given the ax to save over a billion dollars a year. Whilst many argue that this program needs to be saved, I am going to take the opposite perspective and say that it should go.
Why do I think it should be cut? For the same reasons as Martin, plus a few uniquely my own. It's true that many schools don't have enough space to accommodate the new classes full-day kindergarten will make necessary, and it would cost millions to renovate the schools to make it possible.
Secondly, no kindergarten kid can work in a room with 25-29 other wee, attention-demanding lads pulling on the teacher's arm and telling him/her: "teacher, I have to go, I have to go...oh, too late!" The provincial mandate of 20 for half-day kindergarten is still high, but much more manageable than 30 youngsters for a full day. I know that in theory classes have 2 adults in them now, a teacher and early childhood educator, but that doesn't always happen and 4 grownups wouldn't be enough to sort out all the issues that 30 JK students can have from 9-2:30.
On a more basic note, I also think that a full day of school is too long for a 4-6 year-old, no matter how many nap times you give them. The theory is that students can learn a lot more and be much more advanced by grade 1 if they spend all day in school in kindergarten, but this idea forgets the simple truth that there is only so much a young kid can absorb in a day and only so much time they can spend concentrating.
The provincial government got rid of grade 13 in high schools about a decade ago and has since tried to teach 15 years of material in 14 years, starting with more advanced learning at the lowest levels. The only problem is that students are not ready for more advanced ideas at younger ages, especially JK, so cutting off a year at the top end and tacking on class time at the bottom doesn't even out.
So, all in all, I say scrap full-day kindergarten. I know that it would leave lots of kindergarten teachers and ECE's out of work, which is definitely a shame. But, just in terms of the program itself, it isn't working and the money would be better spent giving those ECE's jobs in daycares and such. They could also be kept on to work in half-day kindergarten classes. Hell, 5 adults could be put to good use in any class with little ones, so why not keep the ECE's on to lend a helping hand?
http://theagenda.tvo.org/blog/agenda-blogs/rollout-full-day-kindergarten
Essentially, she is not a big fan of full-day kindergarten because it hurts daycare funding, many schools don't have enough classrooms equipped with bathrooms and the like to house all the registered youngsters and the class sizes are too big for any teacher/ECE to effectively look after the emotional and educational needs of students who are under 5 years old.
This is a timely article, given that Don Drummond's report on ways to control provincial government spending in Ontario is likely to suggest that full-day kindergarten be given the ax to save over a billion dollars a year. Whilst many argue that this program needs to be saved, I am going to take the opposite perspective and say that it should go.
Why do I think it should be cut? For the same reasons as Martin, plus a few uniquely my own. It's true that many schools don't have enough space to accommodate the new classes full-day kindergarten will make necessary, and it would cost millions to renovate the schools to make it possible.
Secondly, no kindergarten kid can work in a room with 25-29 other wee, attention-demanding lads pulling on the teacher's arm and telling him/her: "teacher, I have to go, I have to go...oh, too late!" The provincial mandate of 20 for half-day kindergarten is still high, but much more manageable than 30 youngsters for a full day. I know that in theory classes have 2 adults in them now, a teacher and early childhood educator, but that doesn't always happen and 4 grownups wouldn't be enough to sort out all the issues that 30 JK students can have from 9-2:30.
On a more basic note, I also think that a full day of school is too long for a 4-6 year-old, no matter how many nap times you give them. The theory is that students can learn a lot more and be much more advanced by grade 1 if they spend all day in school in kindergarten, but this idea forgets the simple truth that there is only so much a young kid can absorb in a day and only so much time they can spend concentrating.
The provincial government got rid of grade 13 in high schools about a decade ago and has since tried to teach 15 years of material in 14 years, starting with more advanced learning at the lowest levels. The only problem is that students are not ready for more advanced ideas at younger ages, especially JK, so cutting off a year at the top end and tacking on class time at the bottom doesn't even out.
So, all in all, I say scrap full-day kindergarten. I know that it would leave lots of kindergarten teachers and ECE's out of work, which is definitely a shame. But, just in terms of the program itself, it isn't working and the money would be better spent giving those ECE's jobs in daycares and such. They could also be kept on to work in half-day kindergarten classes. Hell, 5 adults could be put to good use in any class with little ones, so why not keep the ECE's on to lend a helping hand?
Tuesday, February 07, 2012
You Don't Say... Tuesday February 7, 2012
I'm not saying that Prime Minister Stephen Harper's announcements that the retirement age and how the government selects immigrants is about to change were sneaky and cowardly, but considering he made the changes without consulting the Canadian public, it wasn't his bravest moment. Heck, even Dick Cheney climbed out of his cave to admit he lost respect for Harper's testicular fortitude.
I'm not saying that if Toronto City Council votes to abandon Rob Ford's plan of building underground subways and re-adopts David Miller's Transit City plan it would mean the death of the mayor's re-election bid, but it would mean that almost everything Ford promised to do in his election campaign would have failed to come to pass. I hear he has a minister and undertaker on speed dial.
I'm not saying it's completely and unequivocally wrong for the federal government to use intelligence gained through torture to protect the lives of Canadians, but that information is incredibly tainted and how can we trust it to be in any way true and accurate? People can be made to say anything to make the pain stop. That is doing something unspeakably terrible to achieve a questionable result like killing an entire family of people because you want their house and car. Amnesty International Canada has already condemned this attitude.
I'm not saying that if Toronto City Council votes to abandon Rob Ford's plan of building underground subways and re-adopts David Miller's Transit City plan it would mean the death of the mayor's re-election bid, but it would mean that almost everything Ford promised to do in his election campaign would have failed to come to pass. I hear he has a minister and undertaker on speed dial.
I'm not saying it's completely and unequivocally wrong for the federal government to use intelligence gained through torture to protect the lives of Canadians, but that information is incredibly tainted and how can we trust it to be in any way true and accurate? People can be made to say anything to make the pain stop. That is doing something unspeakably terrible to achieve a questionable result like killing an entire family of people because you want their house and car. Amnesty International Canada has already condemned this attitude.
Monday, February 06, 2012
You Don't Say... Monday February 6, 2012
I'm not saying that the Ford administration got the better deal when the tentative agreement with Toronto's outdoor workers was reached on Sunday, but job security certainly took a beating. On the other hand, it appears that the union gained salary increases and got EMS declared an essential service, so we will call this one a draw.
I'm not saying that I don't like the 8 degree temperature we are experiencing in Toronto today, but does anyone else feel that some heavenly or hellish force is just teasing us with this warmer-than-average February before utterly destroying us in the days to come? The planet is out of whack and I think I might start up my countdown to 12-12-12 clock...
I'm not saying that Sarah Burke's insurance company did anything illegal in any way, but to claim that she wasn't covered for the event that cost her her life because it was a "corporate" event and not part of her normal tour events is really slimy if you ask me. Kudos to all who donated money to her family to pay her $200,000 medical bill that the cheapskate insurance company that represented the X Games wouldn't cover.
I'm not saying it was stupid of China and Russia to block UN motions to take more drastic action to protect the people of Syria, but diplomacy has failed for months on end and the time to remove the Assad regime is at hand.
I'm not saying that building more underground subways in Toronto is not possible in the future, but it won't be financially affordable for 800,000 years unless the city, province and federal government all pitch in more funds to make it happen. They did offer money for Transit City, but Mayor Ford decided to kill that deal his first day in office because he doesn't want to "obstruct" road traffic with streetcars. Good luck with your private sector funding Mr. Mayor. Toronto needs something now and, according to experts, an LRT system is the best way to go.
I'm not saying that Greek hydro companies didn't have the legal right to turn off the heat in homes that couldn't afford to pay their bills last week, but it's inhumane to leave people literally freezing to death during the worst cold snap of the year. Greece and the rest of the world can take their austerity measures and tax increases and...
Finally, I'm not saying that Caterpillar and their subsidiary Progress Rail Services are not cowards and evil, greedy monkeys, but when they demanded that workers at their unionized London factory take 50% pay cuts and closed the plant shortly after employees rejected that request, they proved without a shadow of a doubt that they don't give a damn about their employees. I would understand Caterpillar's claim that this factory has become "economically unsustainable" if the company hadn't earned a record $5 billion in profits last quarter. The government needs to step in and compensate workers. Kudos to Mark's Work Wearhouse for taking Caterpillar products off it's shelves.
I'm not saying that I don't like the 8 degree temperature we are experiencing in Toronto today, but does anyone else feel that some heavenly or hellish force is just teasing us with this warmer-than-average February before utterly destroying us in the days to come? The planet is out of whack and I think I might start up my countdown to 12-12-12 clock...
I'm not saying that Sarah Burke's insurance company did anything illegal in any way, but to claim that she wasn't covered for the event that cost her her life because it was a "corporate" event and not part of her normal tour events is really slimy if you ask me. Kudos to all who donated money to her family to pay her $200,000 medical bill that the cheapskate insurance company that represented the X Games wouldn't cover.
I'm not saying it was stupid of China and Russia to block UN motions to take more drastic action to protect the people of Syria, but diplomacy has failed for months on end and the time to remove the Assad regime is at hand.
I'm not saying that building more underground subways in Toronto is not possible in the future, but it won't be financially affordable for 800,000 years unless the city, province and federal government all pitch in more funds to make it happen. They did offer money for Transit City, but Mayor Ford decided to kill that deal his first day in office because he doesn't want to "obstruct" road traffic with streetcars. Good luck with your private sector funding Mr. Mayor. Toronto needs something now and, according to experts, an LRT system is the best way to go.
I'm not saying that Greek hydro companies didn't have the legal right to turn off the heat in homes that couldn't afford to pay their bills last week, but it's inhumane to leave people literally freezing to death during the worst cold snap of the year. Greece and the rest of the world can take their austerity measures and tax increases and...
Finally, I'm not saying that Caterpillar and their subsidiary Progress Rail Services are not cowards and evil, greedy monkeys, but when they demanded that workers at their unionized London factory take 50% pay cuts and closed the plant shortly after employees rejected that request, they proved without a shadow of a doubt that they don't give a damn about their employees. I would understand Caterpillar's claim that this factory has become "economically unsustainable" if the company hadn't earned a record $5 billion in profits last quarter. The government needs to step in and compensate workers. Kudos to Mark's Work Wearhouse for taking Caterpillar products off it's shelves.
Sunday, February 05, 2012
On the Royal Rumble
I know I am late again with my wrestling reviews, but here was my take on the Rumble when I watched it:
The Good...
The CM Punk vs. Dolph Ziggler match featured excellent moves and good storytelling in the ring, then you had the Punk-Laurinitis interaction outside the ring that gave it extra gusto. Good all-around match that finally woke up the crowd.
The Royal Rumble match itself was full of unique spots like Kofi Kingston avoiding elimination by walking on his hands. There also was the Socko vs. Cobra moment between Mick Foley and Santino Marella. Futhermore, Road Dogg showed he's still got it in the ring and there were enough surprises to make this match memorable among the 24 previous Rumble matches. Jericho almost pulled out the victory, but I didn't mind that WWE didn't go with the predictable winner and gave Sheamus the push with the win.
The announcers actually kept the bickering to a minimum and called matches. They have been doing that recently and it has added to - or at least not taken away from - the overall effectiveness of the show.
The Bad...
The cage match between Daniel Bryan, Big Show and Mark Henry lacked any big spots or anything to make it stand out. One could have predicted that given Mark Henry's injuries and the fact that Big Show can't exactly climb out of the ring easily.
John Cena and Kane had some nice brawling moments in their match and got mild pops from the crowd, including tenacious boos when Cena walked to the ring. The double count out and subsequent beating of Zack Ryder bothered me though. A count out is not the way to end a pay-per-view match and Ryder has taken enough punishment over the past few weeks. Dear WWE: stop burying him!
The crowd didn't sustain any real noise or excitement. They weren't bad, but just not as good as Rumble crowds of old.
The Ugly...
An 8-diva tag match at the Royal Rumble? Seriously? This is a waste-of-time Raw match at best. At least make it for the title. I will grant that the ladies got more time to let the match unfold in the ring than they do on weekly TV, but this could have been thought out much better.
A Brodus Clay squash match on a PPV? Seriously? I know I sound like broken record, but why was this on the Royal Rumble card? Drew McIntyre continued to get buried and Clay didn't get enough time to establish the fact that he can actually wrestle and/or entertain in the ring. This is a match that I would bitch about being on Raw, so why put it on a PPV? Take it away and give the other matches (like Punk-Ziggler) more time to play out.
Overall: 72/100
Punk-Ziggler-Johnny Ace and the Rumble match got the crowd going, but the rest felt like an episode of Monday Night Raw.
Your thoughts on the big show?
The Good...
The CM Punk vs. Dolph Ziggler match featured excellent moves and good storytelling in the ring, then you had the Punk-Laurinitis interaction outside the ring that gave it extra gusto. Good all-around match that finally woke up the crowd.
The Royal Rumble match itself was full of unique spots like Kofi Kingston avoiding elimination by walking on his hands. There also was the Socko vs. Cobra moment between Mick Foley and Santino Marella. Futhermore, Road Dogg showed he's still got it in the ring and there were enough surprises to make this match memorable among the 24 previous Rumble matches. Jericho almost pulled out the victory, but I didn't mind that WWE didn't go with the predictable winner and gave Sheamus the push with the win.
The announcers actually kept the bickering to a minimum and called matches. They have been doing that recently and it has added to - or at least not taken away from - the overall effectiveness of the show.
The Bad...
The cage match between Daniel Bryan, Big Show and Mark Henry lacked any big spots or anything to make it stand out. One could have predicted that given Mark Henry's injuries and the fact that Big Show can't exactly climb out of the ring easily.
John Cena and Kane had some nice brawling moments in their match and got mild pops from the crowd, including tenacious boos when Cena walked to the ring. The double count out and subsequent beating of Zack Ryder bothered me though. A count out is not the way to end a pay-per-view match and Ryder has taken enough punishment over the past few weeks. Dear WWE: stop burying him!
The crowd didn't sustain any real noise or excitement. They weren't bad, but just not as good as Rumble crowds of old.
The Ugly...
An 8-diva tag match at the Royal Rumble? Seriously? This is a waste-of-time Raw match at best. At least make it for the title. I will grant that the ladies got more time to let the match unfold in the ring than they do on weekly TV, but this could have been thought out much better.
A Brodus Clay squash match on a PPV? Seriously? I know I sound like broken record, but why was this on the Royal Rumble card? Drew McIntyre continued to get buried and Clay didn't get enough time to establish the fact that he can actually wrestle and/or entertain in the ring. This is a match that I would bitch about being on Raw, so why put it on a PPV? Take it away and give the other matches (like Punk-Ziggler) more time to play out.
Overall: 72/100
Punk-Ziggler-Johnny Ace and the Rumble match got the crowd going, but the rest felt like an episode of Monday Night Raw.
Your thoughts on the big show?
Friday, February 03, 2012
On the Equality Petition
If you want to know what I stand for and what I want to see happen, then check out the link below. Tax fairness and wage equality would go a long way to fixing what I perceive as some of the biggest social ills in the world today.
If you agree with me, then sign the petition below and help continue the fight for economic and humanitarian reform. If not, I would like to know what you would rather see as ways to fix economies that are clearly broken, where the middle class is disappearing and the number of unemployed and people living below the poverty line is growing. And I'm being sincere about that. I would like to have a dialogue with people about how we can make the world a better place.
http://www.straightgoods.ca/2012/ViewArticle.cfm?Ref=103
If you agree with me, then sign the petition below and help continue the fight for economic and humanitarian reform. If not, I would like to know what you would rather see as ways to fix economies that are clearly broken, where the middle class is disappearing and the number of unemployed and people living below the poverty line is growing. And I'm being sincere about that. I would like to have a dialogue with people about how we can make the world a better place.
http://www.straightgoods.ca/2012/ViewArticle.cfm?Ref=103
On Bad Bargaining Practices
Rob Ford and his staff keep finding new ways to make me sick. This time it involves bad negotiating practices with the city's unionized workers. City just tabled an 11th hour offer to workers that takes away job security and benefits and makes it easier to fire workers. Not only that, they said that the city will impose these new conditions whether the union accepts them or not, forcing unionized workers to accept their terms or go on strike. Read the Toronto Star article about the situation below.
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1125812--city-of-toronto-s-threatening-final-offer-rejected-by-union?bn=1
Basically, Ford is trying to paint the union as the bad guys by giving them an offer they can't accept and then letting them go on strike. This prevents Ford from having to look like the bad guy by locking workers out on Sunday if a new deal is not in place.
This is a really dirty, underhanded tactic that someone who truly wanted a deal in place before the current contract runs out wouldn't do. It is, yet again, another case of bullying by the Ford administration and it is their way of trying to divide and break down the union and to turn the public against them. Essentially, I believe they feel that if the union goes on strike, then Ford's team can villainize them them and convince the public to demand the city use cheaper, non-unionized workers.
Whether you like unions or not, dirty bargaining practices have no place in honest negotiations. Ford and his stooges have to go. They have to go soon before they destroy this city!
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1125812--city-of-toronto-s-threatening-final-offer-rejected-by-union?bn=1
Basically, Ford is trying to paint the union as the bad guys by giving them an offer they can't accept and then letting them go on strike. This prevents Ford from having to look like the bad guy by locking workers out on Sunday if a new deal is not in place.
This is a really dirty, underhanded tactic that someone who truly wanted a deal in place before the current contract runs out wouldn't do. It is, yet again, another case of bullying by the Ford administration and it is their way of trying to divide and break down the union and to turn the public against them. Essentially, I believe they feel that if the union goes on strike, then Ford's team can villainize them them and convince the public to demand the city use cheaper, non-unionized workers.
Whether you like unions or not, dirty bargaining practices have no place in honest negotiations. Ford and his stooges have to go. They have to go soon before they destroy this city!
Thursday, February 02, 2012
On Austerity
It has become a fact of life that cash-strapped nations are - by their own choice or through IMF or EU demands - turning to austerity measures to trim money off their egregious debts. While in some ways these measures seem necessary and while there is some logic in trimming budgets during a recession, I think that austerity measures are counter-productive and are part of the problem, not the solution. Let me explain:
1. Governments often sell off assets in order to trim money from their budgets to meet austerity requirements. This does save them money in the short-term, but it leads to bigger deficits and debts in the future. Assets often make money for a government (ex. the LCBO in Ontario) and governments don't often make moves to replace that lost income...except for maybe burdening citizens with higher taxes and tuition costs, which they can't afford.
2. Austerity usually means cutting education funding, which is going to make the enormous problem of unemployment in almost every nation on the planet worse. One of the reasons for the huge protests in England in the past 18 months was the doubling of tuitions for many universities. This increase will prevent thousands of young people from being able to afford a post-secondary education, which significantly hampers their job prospects in life.
3. The last time that such budget cuts were made en mass was during The Great Depression in the 1930s. Do you remember what got the world out of that funk? That's right! It wasn't an economy that slowly recovered due to budget cuts...it was World War II. WWII forced governments to stimulate the economy by spending billions on soldier training, munitions, planes, tanks etc. That also gave millions of people soldier or factory jobs they didn't necessarily want. Are we going to make the same mistake and wait until another huge world-wide catastrophy comes along and forces governments to spend money and create jobs again?
This is what I would prefer to see happen to end this recession and get the world back on track:
1. The oft-heard cry of "make wealthy people and corporations pay their fair share" needs to be heard and acted upon. Close loopholes that allow these two groups of citizens to pay less taxes than their secretaries and there ya go...many nations would suddenly have billions more dollars to work worth.
2. Stimulate the economy in a smart way by investing in infrastructure. If you put money into education programs, re-training programs for people who have lost their jobs, green energy projects, road and bridge repair initiatives and other such programs you will fix a lot of the current problems in this country and many others.
Funding education more will drop tutions and allow more people to get post-secondary degrees, which makes it much easier for them to find employment once school is finished.
If you spend money re-training people, their job prospects will also increase and they won't need to collect social assistance from the government anymore, thus saving the government money in the long-term.
If you put money into green energy, you will employee thousands of previously unemployed workers and you will build a sustainable future for your country.
If you repair roads and bridges, you will have a safer society and you will create jobs for thousands more people.
And the other side effect of all this investment is that it will help bring in foreign businesses and investment. If companies see a growing economy with a growing middle class that has some disposable income, they will decide that is a place to set up shop. If they see a city/country with a low unemployment rate and a pretty good average household income, which is the goal of my plan, they will see that as a place where people will buy their products.
Where will all this money that would be needed to stimulate the economy so much come from? Why, from tax reform of course!!!
This is a topic I am very passionate about and would love to hear other perspectives in this controversial debate. Leave comments below to spark the debate.
1. Governments often sell off assets in order to trim money from their budgets to meet austerity requirements. This does save them money in the short-term, but it leads to bigger deficits and debts in the future. Assets often make money for a government (ex. the LCBO in Ontario) and governments don't often make moves to replace that lost income...except for maybe burdening citizens with higher taxes and tuition costs, which they can't afford.
2. Austerity usually means cutting education funding, which is going to make the enormous problem of unemployment in almost every nation on the planet worse. One of the reasons for the huge protests in England in the past 18 months was the doubling of tuitions for many universities. This increase will prevent thousands of young people from being able to afford a post-secondary education, which significantly hampers their job prospects in life.
3. The last time that such budget cuts were made en mass was during The Great Depression in the 1930s. Do you remember what got the world out of that funk? That's right! It wasn't an economy that slowly recovered due to budget cuts...it was World War II. WWII forced governments to stimulate the economy by spending billions on soldier training, munitions, planes, tanks etc. That also gave millions of people soldier or factory jobs they didn't necessarily want. Are we going to make the same mistake and wait until another huge world-wide catastrophy comes along and forces governments to spend money and create jobs again?
This is what I would prefer to see happen to end this recession and get the world back on track:
1. The oft-heard cry of "make wealthy people and corporations pay their fair share" needs to be heard and acted upon. Close loopholes that allow these two groups of citizens to pay less taxes than their secretaries and there ya go...many nations would suddenly have billions more dollars to work worth.
2. Stimulate the economy in a smart way by investing in infrastructure. If you put money into education programs, re-training programs for people who have lost their jobs, green energy projects, road and bridge repair initiatives and other such programs you will fix a lot of the current problems in this country and many others.
Funding education more will drop tutions and allow more people to get post-secondary degrees, which makes it much easier for them to find employment once school is finished.
If you spend money re-training people, their job prospects will also increase and they won't need to collect social assistance from the government anymore, thus saving the government money in the long-term.
If you put money into green energy, you will employee thousands of previously unemployed workers and you will build a sustainable future for your country.
If you repair roads and bridges, you will have a safer society and you will create jobs for thousands more people.
And the other side effect of all this investment is that it will help bring in foreign businesses and investment. If companies see a growing economy with a growing middle class that has some disposable income, they will decide that is a place to set up shop. If they see a city/country with a low unemployment rate and a pretty good average household income, which is the goal of my plan, they will see that as a place where people will buy their products.
Where will all this money that would be needed to stimulate the economy so much come from? Why, from tax reform of course!!!
This is a topic I am very passionate about and would love to hear other perspectives in this controversial debate. Leave comments below to spark the debate.
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
On Ford Bullying... Again
Well, here is another example of bullying and believing they are above the system by the brothers Ford. This time it was Doug who threatened an activist and is playing kindergarten games about an apology. Read more at the link below.
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1124684--doug-ford-violated-code-of-conduct-with-intimidating-language-integrity-commissioner-says?bn=1
Whether you agree or disagree with the policies of the Fords in Toronto city council, there is no room for threats and refusals to apologize. It is not an apology when you tell someone that you are sorry if they "took what you said the wrong way" and then refuse a real apology, even after being told to give one by integrity commissioner Janet Leiper.
There is no need to be aggressive and confrontational just because you think the person you are talking to represents "left-wing unions". And besides, this is a clear indication of the Fords' agenda to bust unions and give jobs to the lowest bidder.
Toronto deserves better. Next election we will demand better.
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1124684--doug-ford-violated-code-of-conduct-with-intimidating-language-integrity-commissioner-says?bn=1
Whether you agree or disagree with the policies of the Fords in Toronto city council, there is no room for threats and refusals to apologize. It is not an apology when you tell someone that you are sorry if they "took what you said the wrong way" and then refuse a real apology, even after being told to give one by integrity commissioner Janet Leiper.
There is no need to be aggressive and confrontational just because you think the person you are talking to represents "left-wing unions". And besides, this is a clear indication of the Fords' agenda to bust unions and give jobs to the lowest bidder.
Toronto deserves better. Next election we will demand better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)